FirePro W4100 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
When comparing FirePro W4100 and Radeon Pro 5300M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4100 and Radeon Pro 5300M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5300M has 70% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
FirePro W4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 8000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−33
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
80−85
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 139% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
18−20
80−85
medium / 1080p
9−10
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 277% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro W4100.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture
GCN
Navi / RDNA
Code name
Cape Verde
Navi 14
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
13 November 2019
Pipelines
512
1280
Core clock speed
630 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
100.0
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
