GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 450 and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 450 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 450 has 24% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
GeForce GTS 450 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 450.
GeForce GTS 450 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 450 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10196 MHz higher, than GeForce GTS 450.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
8−9
55−60
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
9−10
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
18−20
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture
Fermi
Navi / RDNA
Code name
GF106
Navi 14
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 September 2010
13 November 2019
Pipelines
192
1280
Core clock speed
1566 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
25.1 billion/sec
100.0
Floating-point performance
601.3 gflops
Length
8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
