GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 140% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10758 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
85−90
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
20−22
80−85
medium / 1080p
9−10
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 370% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
24−27
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Navi / RDNA
Code name
GT200B
Navi 14
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 December 2008
13 November 2019
Pipelines
240
1280
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
100.0
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.5
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
medium sized
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
