GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro 5300M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro 5300M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 240% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 11001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GT200B | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |