GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro 5300M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro 5300M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Radeon Pro 5300M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 76% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Navi / RDNA |
| Code name | GF104 | Navi 14 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 13 November 2019 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 100.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |