GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro 5300M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Radeon Pro 5300M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 135% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
6−7
35−40
4K / 2160p
5−6
18−20
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
250−260
medium / 768p
170−180
220−230
ultra / 1080p
95−100
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
130−140
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
95−100
180−190
medium / 1080p
50−55
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
8−9
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
140−150
medium / 768p
70−75
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
130−140
medium / 768p
30−35
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture
Fermi
Navi / RDNA
Code name
GF100
Navi 14
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
13 November 2019
Pipelines
352
1280
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
100.0
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
