NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon Pro 5300M Check Price

Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:

Radeon Pro 5300M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	85 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro 5300M has 142% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	60−65
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
high / 768p	12−14	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture	Kepler	Navi / RDNA
Code name	GK107	Navi 14
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	13 November 2019
Pipelines	192	1280
Core clock speed	797 MHz
Boost Clock		1250 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	100.0
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares