Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 or Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 5300M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5300M has 142% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
35−40
4K / 2160p
6−7
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
250−260
medium / 768p
190−200
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
65−70
110−120
4K / 2160p
35−40
70−75
high / 768p
150−160
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
110−120
180−190
medium / 1080p
60−65
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
30−33
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−12
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
95−100
140−150
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
35−40
70−75
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
QHD / 1440p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
130−140
medium / 768p
40−45
85−90
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 5300M
Architecture
Polaris
Navi / RDNA
Code name
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Navi 14
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
8 August 2016
13 November 2019
Pipelines
1024
1280
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
1250 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
100.0
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
