Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 FURY X
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon R9 FURY X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5300M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 FURY X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP)
85 Watt
275 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR6
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 FURY X has 223% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
Radeon Pro 5300M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon R9 FURY X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon R9 FURY X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Radeon Pro 5300M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 FURY X - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 5300M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 FURY X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
55−60
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
220−230
230−240
ultra / 1080p
180−190
−
QHD / 1440p
110−120
150−160
4K / 2160p
70−75
100−110
high / 768p
210−220
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
45−50
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
QHD / 1440p
27−30
40−45
4K / 2160p
14−16
21−24
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
21−24
low / 720p
180−190
220−230
medium / 1080p
110−120
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Fortnite is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
24−27
30−35
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
65−70
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
140−150
160−170
medium / 768p
120−130
150−160
high / 1080p
70−75
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 51% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
130−140
190−200
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 48% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
high / 768p
60−65
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture
Navi / RDNA
GCN 3.0
Code name
Navi 14
Fiji
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
13 November 2019
24 June 2015
Pipelines
1280
4096
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
6,400 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.0
268.8
Floating-point performance
8,602 gflops
Length
191 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
858 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
33.4 Mh/s
Compute units
64
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price
