Radeon Pro 5300M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon Pro 5300M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 5300M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 180% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- Radeon Pro 5300M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- Radeon Pro 5300M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5300M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 9012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 5300M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 5300M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5300M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 14 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.0 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |