GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti stacks up against Radeon Pro 5500M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 13% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Architecture | Turing | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | TU117 | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI