GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro 5500M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Pro 5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Radeon Pro 5500M
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
GeForce GTX 760 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 5500M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760.
GeForce GTX 760 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 760 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 9000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
18−20
35−40
4K / 2160p
10−11
18−20
low / 720p
75−80
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
240−250
250−260
medium / 768p
210−220
220−230
ultra / 1080p
130−140
180−190
QHD / 1440p
100−110
110−120
4K / 2160p
60−65
70−75
high / 768p
180−190
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
QHD / 1440p
21−24
27−30
4K / 2160p
9−10
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
80−85
medium / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
140−150
180−190
medium / 1080p
85−90
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
18−20
30−35
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
110−120
140−150
medium / 768p
100−110
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
45−50
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
45−50
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Radeon Pro 5500M
Architecture
Kepler
Navi / RDNA
Code name
GK104
Navi 14
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 June 2013
13 November 2019
Pipelines
1152
1536
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
139.2
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1152
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
83 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3.5 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt
PhysX
+
Check Price
Check Price
