Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Pro 5500M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 5500M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 5500M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro 5500M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5500M has 466% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−11
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro 5500M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Navi / RDNA
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Navi 14
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
13 November 2019
Pipelines
48
1536
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
139.2
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
