Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 5500M
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 6988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GM107 | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 139.2 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |