Radeon Pro 5500M vs Tesla M6
When comparing Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M6
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 5500M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 17% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 6988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 5500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 5500M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 139.2 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |