Radeon Pro 5500M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5500M will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR6
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon Pro 5500M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
1−2
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−33
medium / 1080p
40−45
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
55−60
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
35−40
1−2
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
45−50
medium / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Radeon Pro 5500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
200−210
medium / 768p
220−230
170−180
ultra / 1080p
180−190
90−95
QHD / 1440p
110−120
50−55
4K / 2160p
70−75
24−27
high / 768p
210−220
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Radeon Pro 5500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
45−50
16−18
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
5−6
low / 720p
80−85
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
60−65
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
12−14
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
95−100
medium / 1080p
110−120
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 117% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
60−65
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
30−35
6−7
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
140−150
80−85
medium / 768p
120−130
70−75
high / 1080p
70−75
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−12
QHD / 1440p
21−24
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
6−7
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
130−140
50−55
medium / 768p
85−90
30−35
high / 1080p
45−50
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
4K / 2160p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Navi / RDNA
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Navi 14
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 November 2019
15 August 2020
Pipelines
1536
96
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
139.2
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
