FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Pro 555
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 105 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 1480 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 170% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |