GRID K140Q vs Radeon Pro 555
When comparing GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro 555, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro 555 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 555 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3298 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 138% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 268% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1850% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |