GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 178 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID M10 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |