GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon Pro 555
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 555. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 555. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 298 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |