P106 100 vs Radeon Pro 555
When comparing P106 100 and Radeon Pro 555, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 100 and Radeon Pro 555 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 100
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
P106 100 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 651 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 2928 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555. |
Full Specs
P106 100 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Polaris |
Code name | GP106 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |