Quadro 2000M vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 555 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 555 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 305 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 4180 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
60−65
210−220
medium / 768p
27−30
180−190
ultra / 1080p
7−8
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
16−18
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
95−100
ultra / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 720p
8−9
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
0−1
55−60
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon Pro 555
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
Fermi
Polaris 21
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
5 June 2017
Pipelines
192
768
Core clock speed
550 MHz
855 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
40.80
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
1,306 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
2.1
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Check Price
Check Price