Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 555 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 255 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |