Quadro M4000M vs Radeon Pro 555
When choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 555, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 555.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 555 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M or Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
55−60
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
9−10
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
180−190
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
55−60
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
45−50
18−20
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
20−22
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
10−11
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−11
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
130−140
55−60
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
20−22
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon Pro 555
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM204
Polaris 21
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
5 June 2017
Pipelines
1,280
768
Core clock speed
975 MHz
855 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
78.00
40.80
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
1,306 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.2
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price