Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 555 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 281 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 2080 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |