Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 555 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 281 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 2092 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |