Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 555 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- Radeon Pro 555 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 298 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 135% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 132% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 135% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 102% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 135% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 555. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |