FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 555X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 555X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 555X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 26% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 19% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 43.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |