FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Pro 555X
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 105 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 1480 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Battlefield 5 is 161% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Fortnite is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 43.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |