FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro 555X
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 555X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 555X.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 30 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 480 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Far Cry 5 is 29% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Fortnite is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Minecraft is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 43.54 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 860M
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 470
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 860M
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 470