GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon Pro 555X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 555X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 555X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 174 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 43.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon Pro 555X vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 860M
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 470
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 860M
- Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 470