GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro 555X
When comparing GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 555X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 555X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 110 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Fortnite is 29% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 43.54 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |