Radeon Pro 555X vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 281 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 2092 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |