FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 43 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 560. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |