FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro 560
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 7 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 420 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 560. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |