FirePro W5100 vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 560 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 23 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Bonaire | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |