GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 279 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 1072 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK106 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |