GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon Pro 560
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 560, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 1Q stacks up against Radeon Pro 560, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 1Q
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 560 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 350 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 560 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |