Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between Quadro M2000 and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon Pro 560
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
128 Bit
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Quadro M2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon Pro 560 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro M2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 111 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro M2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1532 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M2000 and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
90−95
70−75
4K / 2160p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
35−40
30−33
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon Pro 560
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GM206
Polaris 21
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
8 April 2016
5 June 2017
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
796 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
+
1.2.131
CUDA
5.2
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
