Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 560 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 7 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 194% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |