Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon R7 M350
When comparing Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M350, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M350 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 4080 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | + |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |