Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 7 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 4080 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |