Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 560 stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Radeon Pro 560 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 23 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |