Radeon Pro 560 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 560 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 560 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 560 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro 560 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 or UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 560
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 607 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
24−27
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
220−230
130−140
medium / 768p
190−200
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
50−55
QHD / 1440p
70−75
27−30
4K / 2160p
35−40
27−30
high / 768p
150−160
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
21−24
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
7−8
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 111% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
30−33
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−12
1−2
low / 720p
60−65
24−27
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
95−100
50−55
medium / 768p
85−90
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 21% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
65−70
24−27
medium / 768p
40−45
16−18
high / 1080p
21−24
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 560
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Architecture
Polaris
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Polaris 21
Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2017
28 May 2019
Pipelines
1024
32
Core clock speed
907 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
