FirePro M4150 vs Radeon Pro 560X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro 560X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro 560X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 192 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 1080 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 106% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 212% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Opal | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |