FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 13 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tonga | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |