GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon Pro 560X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 560X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 560X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 560X
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 78% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 73 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 5074 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
60−65
80−85
4K / 2160p
30−35
40−45
high / 768p
150−160
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
100−105
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 560X
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 21
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
5 June 2017
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
980 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
64.26
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
