GRID K220Q vs Radeon Pro 560X
When choosing between GRID K220Q and Radeon Pro 560X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Radeon Pro 560X.
GRID K220Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 162 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 266% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 218% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |