GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 560X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 560X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 560X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 162 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 26% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 19% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |