GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 162 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |